|
Midrange Rivals Top Dog
sponsored by Storage Magazine
|
|
|
Posted:
|
18 May 2007
|
|
Published:
|
01 May 2007
|
|
Format:
|
HTML
|
|
Length:
|
5
Page(s)
|
|
Type:
|
Journal Article
|
|
Language:
|
English
|
|
|
ABSTRACT:
It's getting harder to distinguish between a low-end enterprise array and a high-end midrange array--but there are still some important differences. High-end midrange arrays and low-end enterprise arrays look awfully similar these days. During the last few years, features like clustering, mirrored cache, replication and snapshots have trickled down from enterprise arrays, while low-priced SATA drives have moved up to enterprise arrays to further confuse the already somewhat arbitrary array classifications. The midrange array category is getting bigger, a catchall of low-end commodity systems and high-end arrays with specialized features. But there are distinct differences in array architectures in the midrange category that vendors don't advertise.
|
|
|
Author
Jerome Wendt
Founder and Lead Analyst, The Datacenter Infrastructure Group
Jerome Wendt is the founder and lead analyst of The Datacenter Infrastructure Group, an independent analyst firm. Jerome began his career as a systems administrator and has worked in a number of end user roles in both public and private organizations including senior storage administrator, systems manager and storage systems engineer.
|
 |
BROWSE RELATED
RESOURCES
Disk Storage Systems | Hardware Selection | Serial ATA | Storage Controllers | Vendor Selection
|
View All Resources
sponsored by Storage Magazine
|
|
|
|
|
Cramsession Research Library Copyright © 1998-2008 Bitpipe, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners. TechTarget · 117 Kendrick St · Needham, MA · 02494
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Bitpipe Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy. cramsession@bitpipe.com
|